Halifax Media Co-op

News from Nova Scotia's Grassroots

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!
Paid for by Halifax Media Co-op members. Join them today and support cooperative journalism.

Feminizing our Democracy: Women share views on Nova Scotia election

All parties make Town Hall position outlines. But what then?

by Betsy MacDonald

Women from a range of backgrounds shared their election thoughts. [Photo: B. MacDonald]
Women from a range of backgrounds shared their election thoughts. [Photo: B. MacDonald]

K'jipuktuk (Halifax) - As the date of the 2013 Nova Scotia election approaches, candidates from all parties are trying to reach out to diverse groups with the message that they want to make people’s lives better. They claim to care about education, families and our economy, and each party projects a vision of a Nova Scotia in which all can prosper.

What about women?

Constituting roughly half the population and thus half the voter base, women are an important constituency for any party vying for power. Yet issues impacting women and girls are often left out of public policy discussions in Nova Scotia and across the country.

When pressed for information, each party claims to be committed to improving the lives of women. During the NS Election Town Hall on Women’s Equality and Social Justice held on September 19 in Halifax, representatives from the provincial Liberal, Progressive Conservative and New Democratic parties had a chance to outline their positions on issues ranging from poverty, health and childcare to bullying and sexual violence.

In a nutshell, the NDP claims to have made some progressive steps toward gender equality – such as raising the Income Assistance rate, adding new child care spaces and increasing funding to women’s centers and transition houses – but in the words of provincial finance minister Maureen MacDonald, this is “not enough.”

The Liberals say they will invest in women’s services and work on a sexual assault strategy, while the Progressive Conservative approach is to reduce spending (with a vague reference to ‘earmarking’ funds to address sexual violence) while dealing with issues like bullying through tougher laws.

Is our political system in Nova Scotia really responsive to women? According to a diverse group of women interviewed in Antigonish for this story, the status quo is simply not working.

Democratic deficit

It’s not just about the issues – it’s about how our political process functions. This was a common theme among the women interviewed, who expressed that politicians are not doing enough to connect with the communities they are supposed to represent.

“I feel like politics needs to move beyond this ‘I will do this, I will not.’ That’s what we get on the campaign trail and that’s completely divorced from the reality of how we live. Where we’re living things are messy and complicated and contradictory,” said dancer, facilitator and doula Liliona Quarmyne.

Local artist Pat Foote echoed these sentiments, saying “It’s rare to find somebody who cares and who wants to take an office … [because] they want to see some changes. We need to put pressure on our political leaders and educate them.”

This is possible, according to feminist and anti-poverty activist Katherine Reed. “You can always book an appointment; you don’t have to go alone – you can go as a group,” she said.

Using local MLA Moe Smith as an example, she suggested this approach: “You educate yourself and then you bring to him a condensed form of what you’ve learned and tell him what you want. That’s how politicians get influenced from the grassroots.”

Struggling to survive

When it comes to talking with politicians, there are numerous issues that women would like to bring to the conversation. None seems more pressing, however, than poverty. In a province in which 7 per cent of the population is considered low-income and in which poverty accounts for 5 to 7 per cent of our province’s GDP, poverty reaches into every aspect of life.

Antigonish Women’s Resource Centre and Sexual Assault Services Association director Lucille Harper has observed the impact of poverty in rural communities for decades and sees its disproportionate impact on women. She stated that “more women than men are living in poverty and women are living in deeper poverty and … living in poverty for longer.”

In her view, provincial policies related to poverty – such as Income Assistance and legislation around education and childcare – are “not working.” She notes structural barriers to women’s social and economic advancement, saying that: “The fact that women are still paid 70 per cent of what men are paid means that a woman who requires a higher level of education in order to earn a decent living is coming out with substantial amounts of debt and yet is only making 70 per cent of men’s wages.”

Local yoga instructor and single mother Meghan Delorey told a story that illustrates the shortcomings of our province’s approach to poverty. Her cousin, a nutritionist in Halifax, tried living on “what a person on assistance would have left over for food after they paid their rent and their bills and she documented it. … She ran out of food. I think if we made a couple of government officials do those sorts of things … it might shed a little more light on what’s going on.”

Antigonish resident and tenants’ rights advocate Brenda MacIsaac sees things moving in the wrong direction: “The rich are getting richer and the poor [are] getting poorer.”

MacIsaac and Reed agreed that reducing this disparity in Nova Scotia is an urgent matter. “The priority should be to address poverty,” said Reed.

Culture of violence

For women and girls, economic inequality is compounded by sexual inequality that plays out in cultural messages around female sexuality and the persistence of gender-based violence.

“A huge issue that is never … on anyone’s radar is the influence of the media and hypersexualization,” said Liliona Quarmyne, who added that the issue is “affecting our children of all genders.” Although the mothers interviewed want to protect their children from negative cultural forces, they recognize that misogynistic messages are everywhere. “You cannot keep young people away from these things,” said Quarmyne, who recently immigrated to Canada.

Indeed, according to Lucille Harper, for women and girls to even recognize the violence of our culture is like “fish describing water. … The levels of sexual violence, I think, are higher than they’ve ever been and yet it’s increasingly difficult for young women to even recognize what it is that’s happening.” She described the situation as a “colonization of women” where “the boxes in which women are expected to fit are smaller and smaller … in terms of appearance and cultural or social norms … while the expectations that women succeed in very male-dominated streams is higher than ever.” The effects of this colonization begin during girlhood and continue into adult women’s lives, observed Harper.

As far as government’s role in addressing this issue is concerned, the resounding message is that a more proactive approach is needed. “Government knows about bullying; look at Rehtaeh [Parsons’] case,” said Brenda MacIsaac. “Everyone’s just trying to push it under the rug; it should be more out there,” she added.

For Liliona Quarmyne “it’s also about feeling that our political leaders are not part of dialogue.” She thinks that our leaders need to better support parents, youth and society as a whole in having conversations about hyper-sexualization.

While addressing the root causes of hyper-sexualization and gendered violence is a long-term project requiring political will, Katherine Reed suggested that it is possible to help youth in the short term. “The only defense is to give them critical thinking skills,” she said.

Doing things differently

Effecting real and lasting change on issues like poverty and hyper-sexualization – or other priorities identified by women such as electoral form and the environment – requires a transformation of the way we approach politics in Nova Scotia.

According to Lucille Harper, “We need to stop doing things the same way we’ve always been doing them.” As part of this paradigm shift, she asserts that “we need to genuinely trust the people.” This means really listening to communities when it comes to designing policy.

To illustrate her point Harper gave the example of a guaranteed livable income, a policy she thinks would particularly benefit women and girls. She posited that “if we had a guaranteed livable income we would be able to sustain our rural communities in ways that we can’t now. One of the arguments against a guaranteed livable income is that people would just sit around and do nothing. Well, I don’t think that’s true. I think people would be extremely creative in what they’re doing.”

Harper feels that the status quo approach of reducing provincial debt and expecting the trickle-down effect to improve Nova Scotians’ lives is misguided. In her view, truly improving people’s lives “requires a complete revamping of our thinking,” citing the words of feminist scholar and activist Angela Miles who has called for a reordering of society based on values of “caring, sharing and nurturing.”

“If we really put those [values] at the center of what we’re doing, our environmental policies would be different … our economic policies would be different … our health care, the way we treat our seniors, all of that would just really change,” said Harper. “[It] would make us all healthier. And if all of us are healthier, this province becomes an incredibly desirable place to live.”

Her sentiments were echoed by other women, who expressed the need for a fundamental change.

“Be the first one to break the mould. Be the first one to actually do what you say you’re going to do,” said Meghan Delorey when asked what she would like to tell our province’s political leaders.

Liliona Quarmyne took this idea further, offering the following reflection:

“You’re trapped in a political system that is deeply flawed and problematic. How are you going to navigate that? How can you convince me that you are really going to be able, within the political system that we’re in, to make any change?”

Maybe the answer will become clearer after October 8.

Betsy MacDonald is a freelance writer based in Antigonish. She has worked with the Antigonish Women’s Resource Centre & Sexual Assault Services Association and Women’s Centres Connect

Note: an earlier version of this article stated that the NDP raised the Income Assistance rate by 22%.  This is incorrect, only the Personal Allowance component was raised.  The Shelter Allowance and Special Needs components were not changed.  Many anti-poverty advocates argue that with inflation people on Income Assistance have actually gotten poorer over the last four years.


Socialize:
Paid for by Media Co-op members.
Join them today!
1672 words

Comments

correction re increase to social assistance

Great article. Thanks for doing this, Betsy. Can I offer some further information? The current gov't didn't increase welfare rates by 22%. They may have raise the personal allowance portion by that much (just over $220/month, I think for food, clothing, grooming, over-the-counter meds, co-pay on prescriptions, and anything else you can imagine needing in the course of a month that's not related to shelter costs). That's more than any other party has done in a four-year time frame, but they've left shelter allowances the same. At $300, $535, $575, and $620, including utilities, depending on circumstances and household size, shelter is typically the bigger chunk of the monthly cheque. People often have to apply some of their personal allowance to their housing costs because the shelter allowances are well below the actual costs. This is one of the reasons for the brisk business that the food banks are doing. Shelter allowances haven't been increase for six or seven years now, by my reckoning. No public housing has been built in Antigonish for around 20 years, and the programs that are supposed to help community groups and private landlords build affordable rental housing are far from adequate, plus there's no funding for community organizations who are trying to coordinate the development of new affordable housing using the federal government's totally inadequate capital grants that also haven't been increased for over 10 years. ...but don't get me going. It's pretty dismal. Poverty's not a priority. I don't know who to vote for anymore.

Real democratic change in Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia has a long history of political evolution; 1759, 1848, 1867, 1918. When needed the people with a free
press have improved our political system; to make it more democratic, to fix problems, to break up the status quo
and to give us a fresh start. Such a time has come again. We propose:

Electoral Reform
· A party that gets 35% of the vote should not get 60% of the seats in the Legislature. Electoral reform is
needed to give fair results while retaining the voter-representative link. Voting systems such as Single
Transferable Vote provide this.
· Making it easier for independents to run in elections.
· Institute e-voting.
· Direct election of the Premier. Everyone should have a say in picking our leadership.
· Election of Nova Scotia’s Senators.
· The ruling party should not have the unfair advantage of game-playing the date of an election. Election
dates should be fixed every four years and be called Joseph Howe Day.

Better Management of Money and Politics
· Eliminate taxpayers' money for political parties. This is self-serving, unnecessary and unfair. Why should a
certain private group (which is what parties are) get taxpayer cash?
· Political donations can only be made by a Nova Scotia voter, no corporations or groups, with real time
disclosure of the amount and person’s name.

Greater Transparency
· Currently 98% of all voting in the Legislature goes unrecorded, citizens have no record of the voting by
(or even attendance of) their representatives. We will make transparent the working of the Legislature
including reforming the Hansard service with real time disclosure of all voting.
· Full real time disclosure of all government expenses and outlays including MLA salaries, pensions and
expenses.

The Voter Comes First
· Recall. Constituents can trigger a by-election through a signature campaign.
· Citizen Initiative. A signature campaign puts an idea up for a vote in the next election.
· A full separation of powers ending government & party control of the Legislature and returning the
Legislature to its traditional role with every vote a free vote and where your representatives are free to
really represent you.
· The Premier appoints the Cabinet from a much greater talent pool; the general public.
· A written Provincial Constitution detailing the powers, limits and methods of reform for our political
system.
· A mandatory Democracy and Liberty credit in school

The site for the Halifax local of The Media Co-op has been archived and will no longer be updated. Please visit the main Media Co-op website to learn more about the organization.