The provincial government has drafted an offer of $3 million to the Pictou Landing First Nation (PLFN) in return for the Band postponing their lawsuit against the province for at least two years, according to documents obtained by the Halifax Media Co-op. The draft offer stems from a 2010 PLFN lawsuit against the province of Nova Scotia, launched due to the province's failure to clean up Boat Harbour.
An estimated 1,000,000,000 litres of effluent from the Abercrombie Pulp and Paper Mill – currently owned by Northern Pulp -- have flowed into Boat Harbour, and the surrounding area since 1966, according to a 2009 King's College report, causing untold environmental and health damage. The area has described as “otherworldly” by Green Party leader Elizabeth May, for its ongoing pollution.
The draft “Capacity Building Agreement” between the province of Nova Scotia and the Pictou Landing Indian Band notes that the provincial government has agreed to pay $3 million dollars to the band, ostensibly for “Capacity Building” - not for the clean-up of Boat Harbour, and not for paying for the Band's steadily increasing legal fees. The document also notes that the money hinges on the band not attempting in any way to halt the on-going effluent dumping and preventing its members from doing the same. As noted:
“Pictou Landing will not, and will take all reasonable actions to ensure that the Members do not, support or engage in any action that might frustrate, delay or stop the Operation, Northern, or its affiliates and the successors...”
The document states that the $3 million is not:
"...to be interpreted or construed as an admission or recognition by Nova Scotia or Canada or Northern of the existence or extent of any Rights, of any infringement of Rights by Nova Scotia, Canada, (or) Northern...in relation to Pictou's Landing's Rights.”
A second internal band document obtained by HMC notes that the PLFN is “facing a financial crisis”, and that Indian and Northern Affairs Canada itself acknowledges that the Band is underfunded. The document notes that the PLFN's lawsuit cannot continue, due to lack of funding, and that there have been no outside offers of assistance to continue the legal battle. The $3 million is specifically not to be used to fund the lawsuit. The second document notes that:
“...There is no funding available in the current budget to fund a law suit. INAC (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada) has refused to provide funding for the lawsuit. The Federal government has refused to take on the lawsuit using its own lawyers. Nova Scotia Legal Aid has refused to fund the lawsuit. Private lenders have refused to fund the lawsuit.”
If this capacity building agreement is accepted by the Band, $3 million will have bought their silence for the next 2 years, and dumping looks set to continue. If the agreement is rejected, according to the second document, the lawsuit has drained the Band's coffers, and unless a legal champion for the cause can be found, dumping looks like it will continue anyway.
Such news rings dire for not only the PLFN, where the effects of living next door to a 45 year old, 140+ acre, effluent-dumping site, are the most pronounced, but also for the rest of Pictou County.
According to the Pictou County Health Authority's “Health Status Profile” of 2008, life expectancy is lower than in the rest of Nova Scotia. Fewer people now report 'excellent', or 'very good', health than in studies conducted in 2003 and 2005. Heart disease and diabetes are rising, and mortality rates due to respiratory diseases are higher than the rest of Nova Scotia. Pictou residents also have to contend with the emissions of a tire plant, a coal plant, and a now-defunct steel works, but it is the mill that bears the brunt of the locals' blame for the health and environmental issues the community struggles with.
What kind of documents was it that the media coop obtained? The quotes from the documents read very sloppily. Were these memos from a meeting or something?
Great job media coop! Great job Miles!
This is pretty standard. Check with any lawyer. Not so much a 'political' decision as a legal one.
Regardless of how sloppy or unprofessional a quote is.. ITS A QUOTE, that quote gave the article the flavour and some local colour. So what if it was disjointed, it was said with some passion and authenticity, in the heat of the moment. Let's not whitewash the news.. that end quote that was removed was classic.
While it may delay the lawsuit for a few years, perhaps it's best to try and resolve this in the meantime. Perhaps through mediation.
Hi, Dan Leger here. I don't know how my name got dragged into this, but I can tell you I did not receive an email, or at least didn't notice one, from anyone named Pal Bou. I had never heard of Pal Bou and until today, had not heard of Miles Howe or read his piece on Boat Harbour. I did NOT use government contacts to obtain any documents about Boat Harbour, nor did I ask any member of the Herald staff to do so. These allegations are entirely false, a flight of fancy. What is true is that Mr. Howe did not attempt to contact me to verify anything in the above post.
I do recall our assignment editor mentioning a Media Co-op story and saying that Michael Gorman in our Truro bureau had been asked to make some inquiries to try and verify it. Gorman came up with a different conclusions based on his honest journalism. There's no conspiracy here, no plot and certainly no corporatist spin or defamation of any First Nation. There was never any attempt to pit any community against any other community. You had a story, we had a story, end of story.
I'd also point out that the Herald is a locally-owned and operated business, employing more than 300 Nova Scotians. Our mission is local news. We are one of the smallest media companies in Canada and hardly the poster boy for corporate native bashing. Neither is the Dexter government known for overtly anti-native policies, as suggested in the Howe story.
Like any respectable newspaper, we fact-check our material and sometimes our conclusions will be different from those of other media. Fact-checking and follow-up are standard journalistic practices. We did not steal any story and Howe owes Mike Gorman and the Herald an apology for suggesting that we did.
Good luck to the co-op and I wish it well in its journalistic endeavours. Competition is healthy. Mr. Howe's childish and self-aggrandizing diatribe is anything but.
Dan