Halifax Media Co-op

News from Nova Scotia's Grassroots

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!

Farmer's Lockout; Sour Milk?

Members of CEP local 40N say they were locked out, their employer says they're on strike. Which is it?

by Justin Ling

Kim Power speaks to the demonstration.
Kim Power speaks to the demonstration.
Photo credit: JD Hutton.
Photo credit: JD Hutton.
Farmer's Lockout; Sour Milk?
Farmer's Lockout; Sour Milk?
Farmer's Lockout; Sour Milk?
Farmer's Lockout; Sour Milk?

“We achieved a tentative agreement in the wee hours of the morning.” Said Kim Power, national representative for the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, the union that represents Farmer’s dairy employees.

The previous day, the tone was much different.

“I couldn’t eat my cereal this morning,” Said Gaétan Ménard, Secretary-Treasurer of the CEP, addressing the rally at Cornwallis park who had amassed for the August 18th rally.

He waited a couple of beats until the crowd, made up of an assortment of different unions, made sense of the apparent non-sequitur.

“Because the hotel I’m staying at uses scab milk!” The crowd riled up once more with cries of “scab” and “shame.”

Among the roughly 300 people in the crowd were representatives from various labour organizations; the Canadian Labour Congress, the Halifax-Dartmouth labour council, the Public Service Alliance of Canada, United Steelworkers and members of CEP 40N; the union of Farmer’s dairy employees who work inside the processing plant in Bedford, as well as the truck driver who transport the products. The workers have been off the job since July 10th.

Talks broke down between management and the workers on July 7th when management refused to agree to the union’s wage proposal. The union says that the same wages were given to the Farmer’s employees in Newfoundland, and they’re entitled to the same benefits. The breaking point, though, were management’s proposed pension cutbacks.

Once both sides walked away from bargaining, the workers filed strike notice, having rejected the previous contract, and the management locked the union out in an effort to pressure them into accepting it. The workers argue that the management initiated the dispute, while Farmer’s says the opposite.

According to the management at Farmer’s, the strike notice was filed before the notice of lockout and therefore the union is to blame. The Nova Scotia department of labour wouldn’t comment on the language of the dispute, and isn’t sure what happened first.

The two sides agree that both notices were filed within minutes of each other. Power says it doesn’t really matter which was filed first.

“Serving notice doesn’t mean you walk out,” she said. While notice was served, the approval for strike action had not taken place, and the walkout would not have occurred for at least another two days. The lockout notice, however, was immediate.

“If the employees didn’t leave ... they could have been arrested for trespassing.” Power explained.

“[The management at Farmer’s] locked the door then tried to convince the public and their shareholders it was a strike.” Said Rick Clarke, president of the Nova Scotia Federation of Labour.

The details of the tentative agreement won’t be released until sometime after the members vote on the proposal, which is taking place on August 20th. The workers, however, will stay on the picket line until an agreement has been accepted by a majority of the members.

A contentious issue during the dispute has been the use of replacement, or scab, labour while the unionized workers have been off the job.

“Lockouts and pickets are a fact of life, but it needs to happen on a fair playing field,” said Clarke, who called on the province to enact anti-scab legislation. “There are too many laws in this country [designed] not to help the workers but to help employers.”

It’s more than just principal, the workers argue, it’s also about public safety.

"We don't know who's making the milk in there. They're taking people off the street, we don't know if they're professionals," one worker told Global Maritimes.

According to Farmer’s, the workers were non-union employees who already worked in the building.

“Some of them were management,” said Power. “But our members do not recognize these workers crossing the picket line ... We don’t know where they came from.” Power indicated that there were also advertisements posted by Farmer's looking for temporary workers.

"We have products that are going into schools and hospitals ... where is the department of health? This is a public safety issue,” Clarke told the crowd.

Farmer’s disputes this, saying the replacement labour is well trained and the work being done is up to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Standards. A source in the Food Agency said an inspection was done, and there appeared to be no decline in quality.

Regardless, the union is encouraging a boycott of all Farmer’s products. In some grocery stores, the fridges are full of Farmer’s milk, perhaps evidence that people are supporting the union and not buying the milk. While some businesses that rely on the company’s ice cream and milk say their supplies are running low, others say there has been no disruption in business.

Another issue that has been highlighted by the striking members is the use of Farmer’s “Made Right Here At Home” slogan, which they say is misleading. Some of the company’s products, such as their coffee cream, are packaged at the Gay Lea plant in Toronto.

The dispute may be coming to an end soon.

“As of last week, the issues were resolved.” Said Andrea Hickey, manager of Marketing and Communications, who expressed curiosity as to why the rally was held regardless of the progress made in the talks.

The union, however, still had strong words for Farmer’s. “I have a message for management; your expiry date has passed.” Said Clarke.


Socialize:
Want more grassroots coverage?
Join the Media Co-op today.
Topics: Labour
887 words

Comments

  I think Kim Power hits it

 

I think Kim Power hits it on the nose as to why it was initially a lock out, regardless of whether or not the workers were eventually going strike. For the workers to initiate a strike, they would have to walk out of work en masse. But they were never given the opportunity to do so, as is described above. A strike vote simply means that a legal strike is looming. A wildcat strike means that there has been no vote, but a mass work stoppage has been initiated regardless. A strike has not actually been started at all until the point that the workers actually stop work and leave. Or, in the case of a slow down strike, workers would slow down production; in the case of a sit down strike, they would stop work without leaving the workplace. The key is that the workers have to make that first move, not with regards to the simple filing of a notice, but the physical action itself. 

The way the employer is describing how things played out escapes reality. What the hell is a lockout if it not what the employer did in this case? The employer is trying to lead people to believe that  the workers have more power over their circumstances than they actually do, making it appear that the workers have victimized the employer.  

I think it's important to understand who's in the position of power in the dispute. The employer controls access to their factory. Once the lockout has been initiated, the laws of private property give the employer the power to, as is referred to above, have any unionized worker that enters the workplace arrested for trespassing. The workers can try and defy such orders, but then they face the employer's security guards as well as the police and courts.

It may seem trivial whether it is a strike or a lockout, but it actually isn't. Employers in general play off creating the public perception that the workers are the bullies by trying to force better working conditions and the employers are just trying to keep business going for the good of society. This is a false perception that needs to be challenged.

 

 

(No subject)

re:

Everyone can benefit from milk. Milk has been a good nutritional source. It has the ability to prevent person from diseases, it also makes our teeth and bones strong and also it aids you in sleeping because of the balanced nutrients milk provides our body. I've read this site www.dbpdf.com were I get many facts about <a href="http://www.dbpdf.com/pdf/benefits-of-milk/">benefits of milk</a> in our body.

Advertisement

User login


Google+
Subscribe to the Dominion $25/year

The Media Co-op's flagship publication features in-depth reporting, original art, and the best grassroots news from across Canada and beyond. Sign up now!