In the Network: Media Co-opDominion   Locals: HalifaxMontrealTorontoVancouver

Support the Media Co-op
Donate today!

Advertisement

My blog

Blog entries by Steve Caines

posted by Steve Caines

From what I have read, opinions within the Occupy movement, while all seeming to arise from a common general point of view, are numerous and diverse.  Reading through the comments on the various Facebook Occupy groups, blogs, listening in on discussions at Grand Parade, there is a long list of concerns that people participating in the movement express: economic inequality and the influence of big business, climate change, CEO pay rates, the state of agriculture, the state of the news media, indigenous rights, corrupt banks, unaccountable politicians, crime bills, student debt, participation in war. The list is extensive.

I don't think people at the protests are spending much time arguing over the significance or importance of the issues; most of these are common and (I would venture to say) long-time concerns of the political left. What is being argued over however: Just what should be the approach? How are you to effect meaningful change on all of these issues? Just how can people take action on them?

There is no easy answer I guess. But to add my two cents: pretty much all of the things the Occupy movement (and the left generally it seems) is interested in seeing through depends upon having improved democratic institutions.

If the desires are to have more economic equality and economic democracy, more environmental considerations, to effectively fight crime bills and all the rest of issues, it can only come about by having more actual decision-making power at the grassroots level - and that transfer of power can only concretely happen by having better built-in, legally enforceable democratic institutions. Everything depends on having expanded democratic institutions.

The Occupy protests won’t last forever. If there is one thing people within the movement should be striving for in my opinion, it should be to develop a list of demands to expand political democracy within the setup that currently exists – the more specific the better. Recall legislation for politicians, the ability for citizens to petition for initiatives and the holding of binding referenda on issues of concern, Senate reform or Senate abolition, are things that I think are important for the movement to demand. Surely there are more proposals too that could be brought forward in this vein.

If improved democratic institutions were put in place due to public pressure from the Occupy movement, then everything else that is being...

posted by Steve Caines
Democracy in Canada, and all those other nice sounding words

Work hard, enough to pay your bills, read the paper and try and find out what's going on in the world. Come home, cook yourself some dinner, take care of the dishes. See some family and friends when you can, when they aren't busy working to make ends meet too. Make sure to get a bit of exercise, also. Keep yourself healthy. And after all that, maybe try to fit in a bit of volunteer work even...do what you can to help out the person the next door over. Help out your fellow man and all of that kind of thing. Take some time to enjoy things, do what you can with what you have, in your own day to day life. You won't have a lot of control over which direction things take, ultimately, but you'll have some.

The bigger problems, though. You've read a lot about them in the paper, and most of that stuff is really out of your control. Environmental destruction? Global Warming? Just a few of the things that are a tad hard to deal with on a day to day basis.

But, not to worry....for those bigger problems, a system has been put in place. You, my friend, will have an MP - your Member of Parliament. Congratulations! They're your democratic representative. They're going to go all the way to Ottawa to speak on your behalf, to address the big issues, since you can't do it yourself. Want something talked about or changed? Have some concerns or problems that are affecting you, but that are too big to manage? See some problems building down the road and want to do some planning? Find the party member that best represents your views, go to the ballot box on election day, and try to elect them so they can represent you. It's worth a try.

And, sometimes you get lucky! The person you voted for actually got elected, and made it to Parliament Hill. Now you've found a way to have a say on the broader issues. It might be a slow process up there, and involve lots of hot air and grandstanding, but sooner or later, after the discussion, your MP will be able to cast a vote on your behalf on the issues you want something done about. And, most importantly, if enough of other people's MPs agree on that issue, something can actually be done. Still not a perfect plan, but it might work.

Eventually, on comes that crunch time that you have been waiting for. The opportunity to have your voice heard. You and like-minded citizens voted your rep in because they knew the issues, and they promised to vote on your behalf. To lay...

posted by Steve Caines
Introductory remarks from the conference panel
Posters and information for conference participants
Outside the ICC
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives display

Amidst an ongoing debate over public financing of the proposed Halifax Convention Centre, and HRM Council wage increases, there is also a more fundamental political discussion occurring in Halifax. This discussion culminated in the organization of the first Solidarity Halifax conference, held on November 14th at the Agricola Street Italian Cultural Centre. More than 100 activists and concerned citizens converged to discuss anti-capitalism as a political concept and the state of anti-capitalist and left movements within the region.

The 6.5 hour conference is the first of what is planned to be a series of meetings to facilitate discussion and coordination between people of various leftist social movements in the region. Academics, labour, feminist, environmental and anti-racist group members, and otherwise concerned citizens attended the event, to discuss and find effective strategies to address problems within their movements.

The event was discussion-based, and opened with a few introductory remarks by a five member panel, who spoke on behalf of the conference organizing committee. The panel spoke to some of the reasons they had chosen to organize the conference. These included:

  • Within our individual movements, we discuss broader political questions privately, but don't regularly do so in collective settings.

  • There is a lack of “connecting the dots” between our individual movements in the region.

  • Because there are problems that demand immediate attention, we get caught up trying to make small gains, and are failing to discuss broader political concerns.

Thus, the conference was organized as a place to begin an ongoing discussion amongst the anti-capitalist left.

Attendees of the conference spanned the range of those with strongly-developed political viewpoints, to activists who are engaged or interested in leftist movements but who remain undecided about their specific political views. Everyone broke out into groups to answer some difficult questions: Where does the political left really sit at present, locally and internationally? In what direction does the left need to go, in terms of political philosophy and activity? And, how do we get where we want to go?

With various groups in attendance, discussion...

posted by Steve Caines

 Time For Recall Legislation - Letter to the Editor Chronicle Herald

RE: “Our Crisis in Democracy” May 5th. Michael Whalen and Anthony Davis highlighted some important issues regarding the state of Canada's democratic system and people's participation in it, but they neglected to include a few significant points.

Low voter turnout and general feelings of apathy amongst the public toward participating in the democratic system is not due to any lack of caring about serious issues, but due to discontent with the political system in its current form. If the goal is to increase public participation in the political system, then legislation must be put in place that gives people a fighting chance to meaningfully participate. The public must have the ability to work around representatives who routinely refuse to respect the will of the public and/or who insist on working on behalf of narrow interests instead of the public good.

As it stands now, citizens in Nova Scotia have no ability to recall any elected official that disregards the public will. Nova Scotia should follow the lead of British Columbia, which has created recall legislation for elected officials, and referendum legislation, which supports the ability of citizens to petition for binding referenda on issues of concern. Such legislation would help ensure that representatives follow through on the things that they were elected to do, stop misconduct, and signal to the public that their voice matters.

Stephen Caines
Halifax, Nova Scotia

In response to "Our Crisis in Democracy": http://thechronicleherald.ca/Opinion/1180718.html

 

posted by Steve Caines
I For One Applaud the Proroguing of Parliament - by Scott Vrooman

The Conservative government has shut down Parliament for two months, so that they can consult with Canadians about the economy. I, for one, applaud the move (applaud). I ask you, how can the government be expected to learn the interests of Canadians with all of those Parliamentarians yammering on about the interests of their constituents? 

And let’s not forget that these suspensions are quite routine. There was one last Christmas, and this Christmas, and so on. Think of it as a new holiday tradition, like hanging stockings on the fireplace, or delaying Christmas dinner for two months because Uncle Barry keeps pestering you about the torture of Afghan detainees.   

Governor General Michaëlle Jean gave her blessing, and rightly so. It’s not her job to be a nonpartisan safeguard against the abuse of power. No. It’s her job to hand out awards, and pretend to laugh at foreign leaders’ incomprehensible jokes. And she’s doing a fine job. 

Several cynics have condemned the Conservatives with unfair labels like “despotic”, “beyond arrogant” and “freedom-hating goblins that eat your pets while you sleep.” This sort of knee-jerk knee jerking is totally unfair. This government is doing the best it can within the confines of its minority status. And don’t minorities deserve the same rights as everyone else? Rights like being treated with respect, and ruling without worrying about “accountability” or “the poor.” 

This well-deserved break will also give time for Harper to have five new senators appointed, allowing the Conservatives to pass key crime bills that the Senate has stopped. Thank God someone finally has the courage to stand up to the tyranny of the majority. It’s time to stop the Senate from bullying the Conservatives with their moral convictions.  

Once again this shows Mr. Harper’s commitment to efficient governing, without bureaucratic encumbrances like “questions” and “debate.” He gets things done. And that’s what things are for: getting done. Stop worrying about what those things are. 

Mr. Harper has a plan for this country. A real plan, with charts and spreadsheets and everything. Like that great man Milton Friedman, he envisions a society where corporations aren’t bullied with taxes and regulations...

posted by Steve Caines

 

The Dexter NDP: Old Wine, New Bottle? Matt Fodor

“I’ve waited all my life to see a socialist government in Nova Scotia. I’m still waiting.”

— Voter email read on CBC Newsworld on election night.

On June 9, 2009 the New Democratic Party (NDP), led by the self-proclaimed “conservative progressive” Darrell Dexter, swept to power in Nova Scotia, forming the first-ever NDP government in Atlantic Canada. The NDP won 45 percent of the popular vote and 31 of 52 seats. Despite this historic outcome, it should be noted that the NDP ran on a modest and uninspired platform. Therefore, it is difficult to declare the election a victory for the Left.

At the August 2009 federal NDP convention in Halifax, the newly-elected Premier Dexter called on the party to reach out to business. He argued that past efforts to do so were undermined by the party's ‘rigid’ ideology. Dexter’s comments stood in sharp contrast to those of former federal leader Ed Broadbent, who made the case for defending traditional social democratic values. Broadbent stressed that universal healthcare, affordable education, government pensions and other measures supported by social democrats should be paid for “by adequate levels of progressive taxation.” Dexter insisted that his advocacy of tax cuts and reaching out to business was not a betrayal of the NDP’s core values, stating that: “The party is rooted in some very core values, and as long as we are grounded in those values I think we are free to take initiatives right across the political spectrum.” Dexter’s message was simple, get with the times: “This is not a party of the 1960s, we’re not a party of a generation ago, we’re a new modern political party.”[2]

Like other social democratic parties around the world, the NDP has been greatly impacted by the Third Way. In what is seen as a strategic response to the challenges of globalization and declining electoral fortunes, the NDP accepts many neoliberal precepts and a greater role for markets. Third Way social democratic parties move to the right on such issues as taxes, welfare and crime in an opinion-poll driven attempt to appeal to the broad electorate. The Third Way is presented by advocates such as Anthony...

posted by Steve Caines

Why is an apple from New Zealand cheaper than one from Shediac?

Published Thursday December 17th, 2009

Time & Transcript

Where Grand Lake nudges against the great St. John River is an area of flat lands composed of fine soils built from silts carried down river and deposited by thousands of years of floods -- floods still endured today by the people who live on the interval lands of the river.

Though farming still takes place today, this area was once a great centre for the growing of vegetables that were loaded on boats headed upstream to Fredericton and downstream toward Saint John and the communities along the many indentations of the lower St. John River system. The soils are easy to work, with few stones and rich in nutrients drawn from throughout the entire watershed of this large river. These are among the most productive soils in Canada.

Along the shores of the Straits of Tormentine, where the shadow of Prince Edward Island can be seen on clear days, conditions are ideal for the growing of apples. The warm water flowing south from the immense St. Lawrence River moderates winter temperatures and prevents many of the late spring freezes that injure the delicate apple blossoms at more inland sites. In a not too distant past most farms grew apples that fed their local communities and growing centres like Moncton.

The flat windswept marshes of Tantramar near Sackville have deep soils and a water table that lies just below the surface, so that even in dry years water is available to crops. These conditions made possible a thriving farming community that grew cattle and shipped hay throughout the region and even to markets in Europe. Today only a few barns remain, leaning weathered remnants of the hundreds that once held the precious crops.

These are just a few examples of the agricultural and horticultural richness of our area. They are also examples of how much has changed over the last century. With the advent of cheap fuels and refrigeration techniques it became possible to ship foods across continents. Areas like the vast San Joaquin and Imperial Valleys of California began shipping produce by rail, truck and airplane to virtually every community in North America. While initially this transition had only a moderate effect on local growers, more recent developments have put tremendous pressure on our traditional food systems.

As production and mechanization increased in the...

posted by Steve Caines

________________________________________________________________

Speaking Remarks Honourable Darrell Dexter DEFSEC Atlantic

September 9, 2009 7:00 p.m. Cunard Centre, Halifax, NS

 (Audience 200 plus)

Good evening [Business New Brunswick] Minister Boudreau, dignitaries,
colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. A special welcome to the many partners who
have traveled to Nova Scotia for this important trade exhibition, especially
to our partners from Atlantic Canada. We are pleased to be your host for
DEFSEC Atlantic, the largest exhibition of its kind in Eastern Canada.

I understand that this is one of the most unique events of its kind in the
country. I am honoured to both represent the government of the Province of
Nova Scotia and to speak on behalf of this region and industry. With
companies represented here from Canada and around the world, it is an
excellent forum for collaboration among industry and government
stakeholders.

We believe that partnership and collaboration is key in growing this sector
not only for Nova Scotia, but also for our Atlantic neighbors. Over the last
seven years, Nova Scotia's aerospace and defence industry has grown by an
astounding 183 per cent. In 2008, aerospace and aerospace parts
manufacturing accounted for more GDP then fishing, forestry, agriculture and
tourism combined, in our province.

Here in Nova Scotia, the industry generates in excess of $600 million in
revenues each year. When combined with defence spending, the industry
contributes $1.5 billion to the provincial economy each year. The aerospace
and defense industry in Nova Scotia is helping to build a more prosperous
economy in this province. With 80 per cent of annual aerospace sales
destined for export, the industry is poised to capitalize on future growth
opportunities.

This government is committed to supporting the aerospace and defense
industry in Nova Scotia because we recognize the opportunities that these
industries play in supporting our economy. For instance, in July, I was in
attendance when Lockheed Martin Canada opened its new home in Nova Scotia.
The company plans to create up to 100 great career opportunities for our
young and talented workforce as well as our seasoned professionals.

These jobs offer excellent wages and working...

posted by Steve Caines

RE: http://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/bogs-and-frogs-lose-as-suburbia-expands/C...

Congratulations and thanks to Marilyn Challis for fighting for and succeeding in the protection of the wetland in the Bedford Commons. The wetland lies just next door to the Sackville River Watershed and the Sackville Rivers Association (SRA) followed the story with interest. It is truly amazing what one person can do when we decide to become involved.

The mandate of the SRA is to protect the Sackville River and its watershed of over 147 square kilometers. We as well often find that the environment is treated as a secondary item, if it is considered at all.

Currently there are a number of large development projects being planned within critical areas of the watershed (13 small and large sub-divisions are now on the books for development, one of over 1,600 acres and another of 1000 acres).

It is difficult to see how such development can be considered sustainable. Our goal is not to stifle economic development or to micromanage the actions of those who may want to build a home, but simply to push for methods of development that will take the environment into proper consideration. We ask ourselves and others: where is the Master Plan for Development on the Watershed? What about the accumulated effect on the watershed? What is sustainable development for our watershed and the over 1000 other watersheds province-wide?

It is time that subdivision construction must undergo an Environmental Assessment, just like a large mine, road construction project or utility corridor. Just how many golf courses, 30,000 person sub-divisions can one watershed handle until it is just one large watershed of small houses, roads and malls? Where is Sawmill River in Dartmouth, or Freshwater Brook in Halifax?

As the SRA continues to move ahead with its mandate, we will need and depend on the government to protect the environment and the public. It is nice to know as Marilyn has shown that, whereas government bodies are rarely proactive in nature, they can at least be responsive to the actions of concerned citizens who speak up. That is why we must vote and become involved - if we don't who will, just how many Marilyn's are out there?

The SRA uses the...

posted by Steve Caines
More Good Quotes

"The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for."
- Allan K. Chalmers

"You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you."
- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Men fight and lose the battle, and the thing that they fought for comes about in spite of their defeat, and then it turns out not to be what they meant, and other men have to fight for what they meant under another name."
-- William Morris

Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.

Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/goering.asp

Most men do not feel in themselves the competence required for leading their group to victory, and therefore seek out a captain who appears to possess the courage and sagacity necessary for the achievement of supremacy. Even in religion this impulse appears. Nietzsche accused Christianity of inculcating a slave-morality, but ultimate triumph was always the goal. "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth."
- Bertrand Russell

"The first effect is to create a passive mental attitude. Since there is no way to stop the images, one merely gives over to them. More than this, one has to clear all channels of reception to allow them in more cleanly. Thinking only gets in the way."
- Jerry Mander on Television...

User login

Advertisement