Halifax Media Co-op

News from Nova Scotia's Grassroots

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!

Private Power, Public Pain: The For-Profit Ownership of Nova Scotia Power

Blog posts reflect the views of their authors.
This graphic on Emera's executives' salaries has been shared multiple times on social media. (Source: Facebook)
This graphic on Emera's executives' salaries has been shared multiple times on social media. (Source: Facebook)


Nova Scotia Power (NSP) recently applied to the province’s Utilities and Review Board for 3% rate increases over each of the next 2 years.  In bizarrely flagrant fashion, 2 days later the publicly-traded parent company, Emera, released details of its executives’ compensation.  These figures are daunting.  Coupled with the millions of dollars in profits that investors take from the company every year, these figures have helped Nova Scotians become aware of the parasite that they’ve been living with since 1992.

So long as the utility is run as a private, for-profit enterprise, ratepayers will continue to furnish massive profiteering and executive compensation.

While both the Liberals and Conservatives have made their best efforts to capitalize on the malaise felt across the province, their suggested courses of action fail to admit the real issue: ownership.  They would like to make political gains by treating the superficial symptoms, not the deep-seated disease.

The Conservatives, for example, have touted themselves as the champions of the people, proposing acts that would, among other things: compel NSP to divulge how much of each rate increase is cause by government policies, create a panel of citizens to review government policy as it relates to rates, require any policies that would increase rates to be approved by the legislature, and allow the Utility and Review Board (UARB) to determine the utility’s profits.

These proposals are not intended to solve our power woes. Rather, they are attempts to refocus the debate on non-issues.  For example, asking the private, for-profit company to blame government policy (most of which would, of course, would be aimed at reducing rates in the long-run by promoting renewable energy sources) on rate hikes serves only to shift blame from the corporation and its executives to a sitting government that is conveniently not Conservative.  These are not solutions; they are political opportunism at its worst.

(What’s more, this is the party responsible for selling the utility well below its worth, and is currently advocating lowering environmental standards and continued reliance on the volatile fossil fuel market rather than moving toward stable renewable energy sources.)

For their part, the Liberals have consistently proposed removing NSP’s monopoly status.  They want to open up the market to the producers of renewable energy, which they say will make clean energy cheaper for consumers.

The obvious problems with this plan are numerous.  Small producers don’t have the capital to simply start generating substantial clean, cheap power.  Grid-maintenance fees will impact new producers similar the current third-party mark-ups.  All the necessary institutional overlap will be extremely costly.  There will be a massive race-to-the-bottom of service quality as producers battle to lower their own costs by cutting their workforce, paying their employees less, and cutting corners wherever possible.  Eliminating the monopoly is not a reasonable solution to our power woes.

All of these proposals are notable for their abject inadequacy, which is buried under layers of feigned populism.  They do not address the root problem: private, for-profit ownership.

To return to the medical metaphor: these parties want to treat the painful parasite suckling at Nova Scotia’s jugular vein with pain medication.  Only by removing the parasite itself—full public ownership—can we affect progress.  We need to treat the disease, not the symptoms.

NSP’s executives are paid millions.  Its investors reap millions in profit.

The utility has no social mandate.  Its mandate is to make profit.

This profit comes out of the pockets of hard working Nova Scotians of all stripes.  Whether you own a small business or work for one; whether you live in the suburbs, downtown, or a rural region; whether you work a 40 hour week at your job or a 168 hour week at your home; whether you live comfortably in a childless dual-income partnership or struggle to raise three children alone, NSP and Emera are making money off your back.

So long as we have private, for-profit ownership of the utility, executive compensation and profiteering will abound.

By bringing NSP under democratic public ownership, we will be converting 100% of its profit into public goods.  It will help fund schools, roads, rates, and fair collective agreements, not yachts, cars, watches and vacation homes.

It is time that Nova Scotia reversed the decision that was foisted on it in 1992.  NSP is a parasite on the people of this province, and the only effective treatment will be to return it to full public ownership.

This piece originally appeared at maritimeperspective.ca

Want more grassroots coverage?
Join the Media Co-op today.
728 words


......digging further

Hi Jason,

Great article.......just scratching the surface.

In Hamilton Ontario they "privatized" the water and sewer system that was originally funded by the taxpayers. It was such a disaster that they reversed this decision.

If enough citizens and MLA's got on board, we could "Occupy energy" for the benefit of the people of Nova Scotia and throw out the industry that is making profits for its share-holders.

We have to believe that we still live in a democracy and that our elected and appointed "public servants" are just that. Servants of the People............

There is a lot of other information re energy, once you start looking, and it's not pretty.

.....From Canada's NAFTA commitmernts, to "SMART meter" technology ( which causes sickness and is for the benefit of the industry, not people), to the differencies in incentives promised to small producers in Ontario, in comparison to Nova Scotia.........

There is a free-lance writer in Nova Scotia who writes very interesting books and articles for the CCPA (Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives), Joyce Nelson.

The large energy and water Multi National Corporations have a secret plan. (The inter-national and inter-continental plan is for a world grid and pipelines which will be controloled by the industry, not by governments. ) If you search for information about the east coast of North America, the plan is for all of Canada's energy to be exported to USA -see the maps on the industry web sites.

It makes you sick.

Why doesn't Canada have an energy policy to provide energy for its own citizens?

If you need more info. email me.

Frances Oommen

The site for the Halifax local of The Media Co-op has been archived and will no longer be updated. Please visit the main Media Co-op website to learn more about the organization.